Skip to main content

Table 7 Results from BALERGM with variable selection on SCAL data

From: Hierarchical Bayesian adaptive lasso methods on exponential random graph models

Result for parameter selection

Network statistic

Mean

SD

Quantiles

   

2.5%

25%

50%

75%

97.5%

\(\theta _{1}\) (edges)

−5.794

0.995

−7.770

−6.460

−5.782

−5.121

−3.879

\(\theta _{2}\) (out degree 0)

1.212

0.64

−0.051

0.795

1.216

1.631

2.477

\(\theta _{3}\) (out degree 1)

−1.025

0.526

−2.066

−1.372

−1.025

−0.679

0.016

\(\theta _{4}\) (out degree 2)

−0.629

0.407

−1.428

−0.901

−0.632

−0.363

0.189

\(\theta _{5}\) (out degree 3)

−0.207

0.319

−0.853

−0.410

−0.209

−0.002

0.431

\(\theta _{6}\) (1 serving fruit/day) a

0.654

0.308

0.046

0.453

0.655

0.859

1.265

\(\theta _{7}\) (2 servings fruit/day) a

0.536

0.304

−0.063

0.334

0.534

0.738

1.134

\(\theta _{8}\) (3-4 servings fruit/day) a

0.608

0.329

−0.054

0.391

0.612

0.829

1.245

\(\theta _{9}\) (5+ servings fruit/day) a

0.877

0.461

−0.066

0.577

0.887

1.186

1.772

\(\theta _{10}\) (1 serving vegetables/day) a

0.451

0.310

−0.164

0.248

0.454

0.655

1.062

\(\theta _{11}\) (2 servings vegetables/day) a

0.477

0.295

−0.106

0.283

0.478

0.675

1.056

\(\theta _{12}\) (3-4 servings vegetables/day) a

0.587

0.292

0.018

0.392

0.587

0.782

1.165

\(\theta _{13}\) (5+ servings vegetables/day) a

0.096

0.359

−0.644

−0.128

0.109

0.335

0.770

\(\theta _{14}\) (vigorous phys. activities/week)b

−0.011

0.206

−0.426

−0.145

−0.008

0.125

0.389

\(\theta _{15}\) (moderate phys. activities/week)c

0.008

0.042

−0.075

−0.019

0.009

0.037

0.090

\(\theta _{16}\) (days walking 10min/week)c

−0.018

0.035

−0.088

−0.042

−0.019

0.006

0.052

\(\theta _{17}\) (days using parks/month) c

−0.030

0.028

−0.090

−0.049

−0.030

−0.011

0.022

\(\theta _{18}\) (heard of walking program) b

0.333

0.214

−0.087

0.190

0.334

0.478

0.752

\(\theta _{19}\) (participate in walking program)b

0.186

0.244

−0.305

0.027

0.188

0.346

0.668

\(\theta _{20}\) (heard of SCAL)b

0.076

0.191

−0.310

−0.049

0.081

0.206

0.448

\(\theta _{21}\) (general health is very good)a

−0.203

0.206

−0.616

−0.339

−0.201

−0.065

0.194

\(\theta _{22}\) (general health is good) a

−0.247

0.204

−0.650

−0.381

−0.248

−0.113

0.154

\(\theta _{23}\) (general health is fair) a

−0.072

0.207

−0.470

−0.211

−0.077

0.063

0.349

\(\theta _{24}\) (general health is poor) a

−0.479

0.477

−1.505

−0.773

−0.456

−0.160

0.402

\(\theta _{25}\) (gender) a

−0.064

0.15

−0.362

−0.163

−0.064

0.035

0.226

\(\theta _{26}\) (age) c

−0.001

0.005

−0.012

−0.005

−0.001

0.002

0.009

\(\theta _{27}\) (highest year of school completed)b

−0.165

0.205

−0.571

−0.302

−0.166

−0.029

0.240

  1. \(^{a}\)nodefactor
  2. \(^{b}\)nodematch
  3. \(^{c}\)nodecov