Skip to main content

Table 3 Results of influence attacks against each classifier with the PolBlogs dataset, with attacker budgets of 10, 30, and 50 edge perturbations

From: Complex network effects on the robustness of graph convolutional networks

  

Budget 10

Budget 30

Budget 50

Defense

Training

Net

FGA

IG

Net

FGA

IG

Net

FGA

IG

Jaccard

Rand.

0.92

0.872

0.928

0.992

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Jaccard

SD

0.928

0.984

0.936

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

Jaccard

GC

0.936

0.952

0.944

0.992

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.0

RGCN

Rand.

0.08

0.128

0.032

0.224

0.248

0.056

0.32

0.304

0.064

RGCN

SD

0.048

0.024

0.016

0.088

0.072

0.056

0.112

0.096

0.064

RGCN

GC

0.088

0.096

0.04

0.192

0.176

0.048

0.232

0.272

0.056

Cheb

Rand.

0.048

0.184

0.112

0.184

0.376

0.176

0.296

0.456

0.216

Cheb

SD

0.128

0.128

0.168

0.256

0.232

0.288

0.368

0.32

0.336

Cheb

GC

0.344

0.08

0.168

0.456

0.208

0.328

0.52

0.288

0.392

SVD

Rand.

0.016

0.08

0.048

0.04

0.12

0.096

0.112

0.136

0.128

SVD

SD

0.064

0.024

0.064

0.088

0.024

0.072

0.112

0.032

0.096

SVD

GC

0.04

0.04

0.048

0.088

0.064

0.08

0.104

0.112

0.128

GAT

Rand.

0.224

0.224

0.184

0.384

0.408

0.248

0.448

0.488

0.304

GAT

SD

0.12

0.056

0.08

0.184

0.16

0.152

0.256

0.208

0.208

GAT

GC

0.112

0.12

0.064

0.2

0.256

0.152

0.288

0.296

0.168

GCN

Rand.

0.16

0.208

0.128

0.288

0.368

0.2

0.344

0.424

0.232

GCN

SD

0.104

0.096

0.176

0.168

0.208

0.248

0.208

0.288

0.312

GCN

GC

0.072

0.032

0.056

0.152

0.184

0.104

0.28

0.296

0.128

SGC

Rand.

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

SGC

SD

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

SGC

GC

0.056

N/A

N/A

0.12

N/A

N/A

0.168

N/A

N/A

  1. Results are included for Nettack (Net), FGA, and IG-FGSM (IG). For each classifier, we train with random (Rand.), StratDegree (SD), and GreedyCover (GC). Each entry is a probability of attack success, thus higher is better for the attacker and lower is better for the defender. To yield the most robust classifier, the defender picks the classifier/training method combination that minimizes the worst-case attack probability. These entries are listed in bold. Entries representing the most robust case for random training are in italic. Entries listed as N/A did not finish in the allotted time (24 h per trial). Best results overall and with random training are achieved with SVD, while RGCN performs equally well when using StratDegree