Skip to main content

Table 1 Table indicating pruned nodes, identified at each node after each iteration using the graph in Fig. 1

From: Distributed Identification of Central Nodes with Less Communication

Node sets

\(\textrm{ecc}_i\)

\(t=1\)

\(t=2\)

\(t=3\)

\(t=4\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{1}^{(t)}\)

4

\(v_1\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{2}^{(t)}\)

4

\(v_1\)

\(v_4\)

\(v_2\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{3}^{(t)}\)

3

\(v_1\)

\(\emptyset\)

\(v_2, v_7\)

\(\top\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{4}^{(t)}\)

5

\(v_5, v_6\)

\(v_4\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{5}^{(t)}\)

6

\(v_5\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{6}^{(t)}\)

6

\(v_6\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{7}^{(t)}\)

4

\(\emptyset\)

\(v_8\)

\(v_7\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{8}^{(t)}\)

5

\(v_9, v_{10}\)

\(v_8\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{9}^{(t)}\)

6

\(v_9\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\({\mathcal {F}}_{10}^{(t)}\)

6

\(v_{10}\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

\(\perp\)

  1. \(\perp\) indicates that the corresponding node has pruned itself and \(\top\) indicates that the node has reached an equilibrium