Skip to main content

Table 6 Fitness score obtained from various fitness functions using each algorithm

From: A network analysis to identify lung cancer comorbid diseases

Fitness score

Label propagation

Spinglass

Chinese whispers

Louvain

RB Pots

Average embeddedness

0.888

0.721

0.929

0.929

0.929

Average internal degree

9.125

8.113

11.198

11.198

11.198

Average transitivity

0.667

0.601

0.838

0.838

0.838

Conductance

0.148

0.3

0.094

0.094

0.094

Cut ratio

0.008

0.008

0.009

0.009

0.009

Edges inside

101.333

91.1

130.571

130.571

130.571

Expansion

0.984

1.04

1.083

1.083

1.083

Fraction over median dgr

0.27

0.243

0.364

0.364

0.364

Internal edge density

0.709

0.538

0.603

0.603

0.603

Normalized cut

0.157

0.308

0.105

0.105

0.105

Max ODF

6.333

5.8

7.857

7.857

7.857

AVG ODF

0.984

1.04

1.083

1.083

1.083

Flake ODF

0.009

0.208

0.011

0.011

0.011

Scaled density

7.437

5.645

6.322

6.322

6.322

Size

16

14.4

20.571

20.571

20.571

Triangle participation ratio

0.772

0.695

0.971

0.971

0.971

  1. The higher the fitness score, the better the results