Skip to main content

Table 6 Fitness score obtained from various fitness functions using each algorithm

From: A network analysis to identify lung cancer comorbid diseases

Fitness score Label propagation Spinglass Chinese whispers Louvain RB Pots
Average embeddedness 0.888 0.721 0.929 0.929 0.929
Average internal degree 9.125 8.113 11.198 11.198 11.198
Average transitivity 0.667 0.601 0.838 0.838 0.838
Conductance 0.148 0.3 0.094 0.094 0.094
Cut ratio 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.009
Edges inside 101.333 91.1 130.571 130.571 130.571
Expansion 0.984 1.04 1.083 1.083 1.083
Fraction over median dgr 0.27 0.243 0.364 0.364 0.364
Internal edge density 0.709 0.538 0.603 0.603 0.603
Normalized cut 0.157 0.308 0.105 0.105 0.105
Max ODF 6.333 5.8 7.857 7.857 7.857
AVG ODF 0.984 1.04 1.083 1.083 1.083
Flake ODF 0.009 0.208 0.011 0.011 0.011
Scaled density 7.437 5.645 6.322 6.322 6.322
Size 16 14.4 20.571 20.571 20.571
Triangle participation ratio 0.772 0.695 0.971 0.971 0.971
  1. The higher the fitness score, the better the results