Skip to main content

Table 5 Disturbing-recovering comparison under different disturbing ratios

From: Measurement and refactoring for package structure based on complex network

name 6% 10% 14%
  RPO(%) RPM(%) RPO(%) RPM(%) RPO(%) RPM(%)
Ant 79.2 82.4 76.2 80.0 75.6 78.4
Cglib-nodep 82.3 76.2 74.8 74.0 67.4 66.9
Emma 92.8 92.0 86.4 88.7 86.9 86.4
Hsqldb 88.1 86.3 81.1 80.9 79.8 78.9
Jaxen 76.0 74.5 70.3 69.5 64.8 64.6
Jgroups 75.7 76.8 75.0 74.0 65.8 66.1
Ormlite 78.2 72.8 75.8 67.2 66.7 64.3
PDF-Renderer 87.4 84.6 81.8 80.4 71.8 73.1
RabbitMQ Client 87.9 85.6 81.3 81.2 74.7 72.9
Tomcat 91.7 86.0 85.1 84.9 82.3 81.4
  1. RPO: Average Recovering percentage of our algorithm
  2. RPM: Average Recovering percentage of Mi’s algorithm