Table 2 Characteristics of non-dominated networks for all communities
From: Designing bike networks using the concept of network clusters
Community ID | \( \sum \limits_{i\in K}\sum \limits_{j\in K}{h}_{ij} \) | w1 (weight of the first objective) | network ID | User objective (O1) (bike-km) | Planner objective (O2) (km) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 53 | 0 | 1 | 53.53 | 10.2 |
All weights –{1,0} | 2 | 54.35 | 4.3 | ||
1 | 3 | 93.91 | 4.2 | ||
2 | 193 | 1 | 1 | 321.2 | 16.8 |
0.9–0.8-0.7 | 2 | 328.7 | 8 | ||
0.6–0.5-0.4-0.3 | 3 | 335.9 | 7.4 | ||
0.2–0.1 | 4 | 374.4 | 7 | ||
0 | 5 | 623.5 | 6.8 | ||
3 | 242 | All weights | 1 | 277.4 | 4.2 |
4 | 357 | All weights | 1 | 412.5 | 5.5 |
5 | 548 | All weights | 1 | 484.9 | 3.2 |
6 | 71 | All weights | 1 | 96.1 | 4.8 |
7 | 148 | 1 | 1 | 287.9 | 20.1 |
0.9 | 2 | 288.2 | 15.3 | ||
0.8–0.7 | 3 | 297.8 | 12.7 | ||
0.6–0.5-0.4-0.3 | 4 | 336.3 | 8.3 | ||
0.2–0.1 | 5 | 435.6 | 6.4 | ||
0 | 6 | 507.9 | 6.3 |