Fig. 3
From: Comparison method for community detection on brain networks from neuroimaging data
![Fig. 3](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs41109-016-0007-y/MediaObjects/41109_2016_7_Fig3_HTML.gif)
Averaged modularity indices Qs were better for VTS and GA, compared with IS approach. Three rows of symbols on the top of each figure show significant difference (p < 0.05, FDR-corrected) for the comparison of VTS-IS, VTS-GA and IS-GA. Blue asterisks, green Xs and red crosses indicate significant higher Q values for VTS, IS and GA respectively. Error bars indicate SEMs