Skip to main content

Table 1 This table shows the relationships between NeuroSynth terms scores, calculated using the mean activity brain map for each state and the one step ahead projected score for each term according to the model (see Eq. 5)

From: Ranking of communities in multiplex spatiotemporal models of brain dynamics

 

DM

S

E

SM

V

A

DM\(_{t+1}\)

0.9866 **

0.8201 **

0.4601 *

− 0.4416 *

− 0.3939 (*)

− 0.5488 **

S\(_{t+1}\)

0.8253 **

0.9863 **

0.3550 (*)

− 0.5526 **

− 0.5302 *

− 0.481 *

E\(_{t+1}\)

0.4519 *

0.3615 (*)

0.9826 **

− 0.5203 *

− 0.5241 *

− 0.5753 **

SM\(_{t+1}\)

− 0.4576 *

− 0.5781 **

− 0.5215 *

0.9878 **

0.1765

0.3128

V\(_{t+1}\)

− 0.3718 (*)

− 0.5085 *

− 0.5092 *

0.1683

0.9885 **

0.1773

A\(_{t+1}\)

− 0.4874 *

− 0.4226 *

− 0.5364 *

0.2657

0.1733

0.9842 **

  1. Term scores for each state are correlated with the projected term scores one time step into the future (denoted by subscript \(t+1\)) from the current state (bold is positive correlation, italic negative). False discovery rate corrected t test significance is marked as ** (\(p<0.01\)), * (\(p<0.05\)) and (*) for marginal results (\(p<0.1\)). The comparison between state scores for each term and the one step ahead predicted scores shows that there is a spatiotemporal relationship between resting state terms which are anticorrelated with sensory terms