From: Comparative analysis of box-covering algorithms for fractal networks
phd | soc | mou | eco | pol | cel | ful | dol | min | tok | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cbb | 2.0 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
d30 | 2.2 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.5 |
d70 | 2.2 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.5 | 2.1 | 3.0 | 3.6 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.5 |
fuz | 2.3 | − 1 | − 1 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 2.0 |
gre | 2.0 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 3.1 | 3.5 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
mc.25 | 2.2 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.3 | 2.5 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.4 |
mc.5 | 2.2 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
mc.75 | 2.2 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 1.9 | 1.5 |
memb | 2.3 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 |
mer | 2.4 | − 1 | − 1 | 4.9 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
obca | 2.1 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.5 |
ps1k | 2.2 | − 1 | − 1 | – | 2.1 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
ps.2k | 2.2 | − 1 | − 1 | – | 2.1 | 3.0 | 3.9 | 2.3 | 2.2 | 1.5 |
remcc | 2.0 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
rs | 2.4 | − 1 | − 1 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
sa | 2.1 | − 1 | − 1 | – | 1.5 | 1.6 | 3.3 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 1.2 |
sm10 | 2.1 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
sm40 | 2.1 | − 1 | − 1 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.5 |
sr10 | 2.4 | − 1 | − 1 | 4.3 | 2.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 1.4 |
sr40 | 2.3 | − 1 | − 1 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 1.4 |