Table 2 Matrix showing results from transformed divergence analysis for all pairwise combinations, testing the overlap between the graph models for three metric combinations
From: The structure and behaviour of hierarchical infrastructure networks
| Â | ER | GNM | WS | BA | HR | HR+ | HC | TREE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ER | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
AC –MBC | – | 99.91 | 84.78 | 99.58 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
AC-CB | – | 53.22 | 70.14 | 27.90 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
MBC-CB | – | 99.96 | 75.43 | 72.62 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
GNM | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
AC –MBC | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
AC-CB | – | – | 95.81 | 98.99 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
MBC-CB | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
WS | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
AC –MBC | – | – | – | 14.13 | 97.79 | 99.55 | 99.99 | 100.00 |
AC-CB | – | – | – | 43.86 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
MBC-CB | – | – | – | 43.98 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
BA | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | 75.24 | 83.36 | 99.81 | 99.90 |
AC-CB | – | – | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
HR | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | – | 39.84†| 98.85 | 90.23 |
AC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | 27.34†| 99.37 | –* |
MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | 6.53†| 99.76 | –* |
HR+ | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | – | – | 99.99 | 94.71 |
AC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100.00 | –* |
MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | 99.72 | –* |
HC | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100.00 |
AC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | –* |
MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | –* |