Skip to main content

Table 2 Matrix showing results from transformed divergence analysis for all pairwise combinations, testing the overlap between the graph models for three metric combinations

From: The structure and behaviour of hierarchical infrastructure networks

  ER GNM WS BA HR HR+ HC TREE
ER         
AC –MBC 99.91 84.78 99.58 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
AC-CB 53.22 70.14 27.90 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
MBC-CB 99.96 75.43 72.62 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
GNM         
AC –MBC 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
AC-CB 95.81 98.99 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
MBC-CB 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
WS         
AC –MBC 14.13 97.79 99.55 99.99 100.00
AC-CB 43.86 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
MBC-CB 43.98 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
BA         
AC –MBC 75.24 83.36 99.81 99.90
AC-CB 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
MBC-CB 100.00 100.00 100.00 –*
HR         
AC –MBC 39.84 98.85 90.23
AC-CB 27.34 99.37 –*
MBC-CB 6.53 99.76 –*
HR+         
AC –MBC 99.99 94.71
AC-CB 100.00 –*
MBC-CB 99.72 –*
HC         
AC –MBC 100.00
AC-CB –*
MBC-CB –*
  1. Results in the top-right quadrant show the results comparing hierarchical to non-hierarchical networks. A value of 100 indicates no overlap between the distributions, 0 indicates the distributions are identical. *Values cannot be computed as TREES have zero cycle basis resulting in invalid matrices