Table 2 Matrix showing results from transformed divergence analysis for all pairwise combinations, testing the overlap between the graph models for three metric combinations
From: The structure and behaviour of hierarchical infrastructure networks
| ER | GNM | WS | BA | HR | HR+ | HC | TREE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ER | ||||||||
| AC –MBC | – | 99.91 | 84.78 | 99.58 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| AC-CB | – | 53.22 | 70.14 | 27.90 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| MBC-CB | – | 99.96 | 75.43 | 72.62 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| GNM | ||||||||
| AC –MBC | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| AC-CB | – | – | 95.81 | 98.99 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| MBC-CB | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| WS | ||||||||
| AC –MBC | – | – | – | 14.13 | 97.79 | 99.55 | 99.99 | 100.00 |
| AC-CB | – | – | – | 43.86 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| MBC-CB | – | – | – | 43.98 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| BA | ||||||||
| AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | 75.24 | 83.36 | 99.81 | 99.90 |
| AC-CB | – | – | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | –* |
| HR | ||||||||
| AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | – | 39.84† | 98.85 | 90.23 |
| AC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | 27.34† | 99.37 | –* |
| MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | 6.53† | 99.76 | –* |
| HR+ | ||||||||
| AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | – | – | 99.99 | 94.71 |
| AC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100.00 | –* |
| MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | 99.72 | –* |
| HC | ||||||||
| AC –MBC | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 100.00 |
| AC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | –* |
| MBC-CB | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | –* |