|
Network assignment scenario
|
\(\lambda_{o}\)
|
\(\alpha_{m}\)
|
|---|
|
0.78
|
0.82
|
0.86
|
|---|
|
MC
|
FC
|
MC
|
FC
|
MC
|
FC
|
|---|
|
Many OD paths
|
0.20
|
6.9
|
44.5
|
6.9
|
43.5
|
6.9
|
42.5
|
|
0.60
|
14.7
|
67.3
|
17.3
|
69.3
|
17.8
|
68.5
|
|
1.0
|
74.6
|
100.0
|
86.3
|
100.0
|
88.3
|
100.0
|
|
Moderate OD paths
|
0.20
|
9.8
|
47.6
|
10.1
|
43.3
|
10.1
|
43.8
|
|
0.60
|
17.7
|
68.5
|
21.1
|
69.8
|
21.1
|
70.5
|
|
1.0
|
74.5
|
100.0
|
80.9
|
100.0
|
83.6
|
100.0
|
|
Few OD paths
|
0.20
|
9.9
|
49.7
|
10.1
|
43.0
|
10.4
|
42.2
|
|
0.60
|
18.8
|
70.9
|
21.2
|
72.7
|
21.2
|
72.6
|
|
1.0
|
53.4
|
100.0
|
59.8
|
100.0
|
60.7
|
100.0
|
- Summary of optimal PFCP solutions for the three network flow assignment scenarios and model parameterizations involving different combinations of \(\lambda_{o}\) and \(\alpha_{m}\). MC = % of total system cost, FC = % of total system flow covered
