Using a novel genetic algorithm to assess peer influence on willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis in networks of Black men who have sex with men

Johnson, Kara Layne; Walsh, Jennifer L.; Amirkhanian, Yuri A.; Borkowski, John J.; Carnegie, Nicole Bohme

doi:10.1007/s41109-020-00347-2

Applied Network Science

Table 15 Estimated weights for willingness and self-efficacy on network 3

From: Using a novel genetic algorithm to assess peer influence on willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis in networks of Black men who have sex with men

Willingness build
0.05* (0.08)	0.00 (0.00)	0.49 (0.01)	0.46 (0.07)	0	0	0	0
1.00* (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0	0	0.00 (0.00)	0	0	0
0.04* (0.06)	0	0.96 (0.06)	0	0	0	0	0
0.00* (0.00)	0	0	0.15 (0.13)	0	0.51 (0.24)	0.34 (0.21)	0.00 (0.00)
0	0.51 (0.15)	0	0	0.49 (0.15)	0	0	0
0	0	0	0.53 (0.05)	0	0.47 (0.05)	0	0
0	0	0	0.49 (0.05)	0	0	0.51 (0.05)	0
0	0	0	0.24 (0.00)	0	0	0	0.76 (0.00)
Willingness remove
0.02* (0.03)	0.94 (0.15)	0.01 (0.02)	0.03 (0.09)	0	0	0	0
0.25* (0.24)	0.44 (0.34)	0.04 (0.05)	0.11 (0.31)	0.03 (0.03)	0.06 (0.10)	0.03 (0.03)	0.03 (0.01)
0.30* (0.10)	0.05 (0.06)	0.10 (0.11)	0.17 (0.15)	0.13 (0.07)	0.12 (0.08)	0.07 (0.05)	0.07 (0.01)
0.20* (0.27)	0.01 (0.02)	0.00 (0.00)	0.28 (0.29)	0.16 (0.30)	0.13 (0.16)	0.22 (0.31)	0.00 (0.00)
0	0.26 (0.41)	0.00 (0.00)	0.04 (0.06)	0.12 (0.16)	0.30 (0.32)	0.29 (0.33)	0.01 (0.02)
0	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.44 (0.39)	0.08 (0.20)	0.20 (0.29)	0.28 (0.36)	0.00 (0.00)
0	0.03 (0.07)	0.00 (0.00)	0.15 (0.24)	0.10 (0.17)	0.40 (0.33)	0.32 (0.32)	0.00 (0.00)
0	0.00 (0.00)	0.20 (0.07)	0.02 (0.02)	0.01 (0.04)	0.01 (0.01)	0.02 (0.06)	0.74 (0.01)
Self-efficacy build
0.96* (0.04)	0.03 (0.03)	0.00 (0.00)	0.01 (0.02)	0	0	0	0
0.00* (0.00)	0.94 (0.01)	0	0	0.06 (0.01)	0	0	0
0.14* (0.00)	0	0.86 (0.00)	0	0	0	0	0
0.00* (0.00)	0	0	0.93 (0.10)	0	0.06 (0.10)	0.00 (0.01)	0.01 (0.01)
0	0.01 (0.02)	0	0	0.99 (0.02)	0	0	0
0	0	0	0.31 (0.03)	0	0.69 (0.03)	0	0
0	0	0	0.00 (0.00)	0	0	1.00 (0.00)	0
0	0	0	0.14 (0.00)	0	0	0	0.86 (0.00)
Self-efficacy remove
0.91* (0.02)	0.05 (0.02)	0.00 (0.00)	0.03 (0.03)	0	0	0	0
0.02* (0.01)	0.67 (0.24)	0.06 (0.01)	0.14 (0.25)	0.03 (0.03)	0.05 (0.06)	0.02 (0.01)	0.02 (0.01)
0.00* (0.01)	0.00 (0.00)	0.85 (0.01)	0.03 (0.06)	0.01 (0.01)	0.00 (0.00)	0.10 (0.06)	0.00 (0.01)
0.03* (0.05)	0.26 (0.35)	0.02 (0.03)	0.04 (0.09)	0.48 (0.38)	0.06 (0.07)	0.08 (0.12)	0.02 (0.01)
0	0.04 (0.02)	0.03 (0.03)	0.13 (0.12)	0.34 (0.15)	0.13 (0.13)	0.18 (0.10)	0.15 (0.15)
0	0.18 (0.06)	0.01 (0.01)	0.08 (0.05)	0.04 (0.03)	0.52 (0.15)	0.06 (0.04)	0.12 (0.04)
0	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.01)	0.00 (0.00)	0.64 (0.02)	0.35 (0.01)
0	0.02 (0.01)	0.00 (0.00)	0.01 (0.01)	0.01 (0.01)	0.07 (0.04)	0.02 (0.03)	0.87 (0.03)

Estimated weights and standard deviations for willingness and self-efficacy across 10 runs for network 3 using network built with connections known to exist and network where connections known not to exist are removed where weights placed on leaders is indicated with * and italic estimated weights in the remove matrix which are fixed in the build matrix

Back to article page