Using a novel genetic algorithm to assess peer influence on willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis in networks of Black men who have sex with men

Johnson, Kara Layne; Walsh, Jennifer L.; Amirkhanian, Yuri A.; Borkowski, John J.; Carnegie, Nicole Bohme

doi:10.1007/s41109-020-00347-2

Applied Network Science

Table 11 Estimated weights for willingness on network 1

From: Using a novel genetic algorithm to assess peer influence on willingness to use pre-exposure prophylaxis in networks of Black men who have sex with men

Willingness build
0.22* (0.23)	0.03* (0.03)	0.15* (0.10)	0.59* (0.12)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
0.06* (0.04)	0.53* (0.10)	0	0	0.05 (0.04)	0.01 (0.00)	0.25 (0.10)	0.09 (0.06)	0.01 (0.01)	0	0	0
0.09* (0.14)	0	0.74* (0.03)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.00 (0.00)	0.17 (0.12)	0
0.00* (0.00)	0	0	0.50* (0.24)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.50 (0.24)
0	0.24* (0.00)	0	0	0.76 (0.00)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0.12* (0.00)	0	0	0	0.88 (0.00)	0	0	0	0	0	0
0	0.00* (0.01)	0	0	0	0	1.00 (0.01)	0	0	0	0	0
0	1.00* (0.00)	0	0	0	0	0	0.00 (0.00)	0	0	0	0
0	0.22* (0.00)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.78 (0.00)	0	0	0
0	0	0.03* (0.01)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.97 (0.01)	0	0
0	0	0.00* (0.00)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	1.00 (0.00)	0
0	0	0	0.44* (0.21)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0.56 (0.21)
Willingness remove
0.10* (0.07)	0.33* (0.08)	0.22* (0.02)	0.35* (0.07)	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
0.00* (0.00)	0.50* (0.42)	0.00* (0.00)	0.13* (0.25)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.12 (0.24)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.20 (0.35)	0.05 (0.08)
0.03* (0.03)	0.02* (0.02)	0.71* (0.04)	0.02* (0.02)	0.04 (0.05)	0.00 (0.00)	0.04 (0.05)	0.02 (0.03)	0.01 (0.02)	0.01 (0.02)	0.06 (0.07)	0.04 (0.06)
0.00* (0.00)	0.18* (0.34)	0.00* (0.00)	0.28* (0.38)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.05 (0.06)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.25 (0.35)	0.24 (0.36)
0	0.08* (0.11)	0.21* (0.09)	0.18* (0.17)	0.14 (0.18)	0.00 (0.00)	0.07 (0.06)	0.03 (0.03)	0.04 (0.04)	0.00 (0.00)	0.12 (0.09)	0.13 (0.13)
0	0.05* (0.04)	0.22* (0.10)	0.04* (0.02)	0.08 (0.10)	0.01 (0.01)	0.10 (0.08)	0.03 (0.03)	0.36 (0.10)	0.01 (0.01)	0.05 (0.04)	0.05 (0.03)
0	0.06* (0.11)	0.00* (0.00)	0.25* (0.28)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.26 (0.29)	0.20 (0.42)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.10 (0.10)	0.14 (0.20)
0	0.01* (0.01)	0.00* (0.00)	0.01* (0.02)	0.00 (0.00)	0.02 (0.02)	0.15 (0.31)	0.52 (0.43)	0.00 (0.00)	0.07 (0.05)	0.02 (0.06)	0.19 (0.33)
0	0.00* (0.00)	0.93* (0.10)	0.00* (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.07 (0.11)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)
0	0.01* (0.01)	0.02* (0.02)	0.01* (0.01)	0.00 (0.01)	0.07 (0.06)	0.01 (0.01)	0.02 (0.01)	0.02 (0.02)	0.80 (0.10)	0.02 (0.02)	0.01 (0.02)
0	0.14* (0.27)	0.00* (0.00)	0.30* (0.34)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.12 (0.24)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.33 (0.41)	0.11 (0.14)
0	0.09* (0.18)	0.00* (0.00)	0.04* (0.05)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.17 (0.25)	0.20 (0.42)	0.00 (0.00)	0.00 (0.00)	0.19 (0.36)	0.31 (0.42)

Estimated weights and standard deviations for willingness across 10 runs for network 1 using network built with connections known to exist and network where connections known not to exist are removed where weights placed on leaders is indicated with * and italic estimated weights in the remove matrix which are fixed in the build matrix

Back to article page