Skip to main content

Table 4 Results from ERGMs run on 100 datasets with imputed IGScores

From: Coalitions and coordination in Washington think tanks: board interlock among Washington D.C.-based policy research and planning organizations

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

Model 4

Ideological distance

0.014

0.037

\(-\) 0.100

\(-\) 0.066

(0.141)

(0.142)

(0.121)

(0.053)

Match NTEE

 

1.447

1.355

1.066

 

(0.158)

(0.160)

(0.022)

Match dues collecting

  

\(-\) 0.628

\(-\) 0.410

  

(0.166)

(0.017)

Match is lobbying

  

0.127

0.103

  

(0.189)

(0.017)

Match is contracting

  

0.193

0.108

  

(0.167)

(0.014)

Log(Revenue)

  

0.522

0.253

  

(0.037)

(0.013)

Membership dues

  

0.000

0.000

  

(0.000)

(0.000)

Lobbying fees

  

0.000

0.000

  

(0.000)

(0.000)

Edges

\(-\) 5.290

\(-\) 5.571

\(-\) 20.496

\(-\) 12.073

(0.158)

(0.168)

(1.122)

(0.469)

Concurrent

   

\(-\) 0.527

   

0.135

Isolates

   

0.960

   

0.074

GWESP(\(\theta = 0.8\))

   

0.761

   

0.072

Model type

Dyadic-independent

Dyadic-independent

Dyadic-independent

Network-dependent

Replicates

100

100

100

100

Median AIC

2450.750

2386.328

2128.629

2008.582

Median BIC

2467.852

2411.982

2205.590

2111.198