Skip to main content

Table 4 Results from ERGMs run on 100 datasets with imputed IGScores

From: Coalitions and coordination in Washington think tanks: board interlock among Washington D.C.-based policy research and planning organizations

  Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4
Ideological distance 0.014 0.037 \(-\) 0.100 \(-\) 0.066
(0.141) (0.142) (0.121) (0.053)
Match NTEE   1.447 1.355 1.066
  (0.158) (0.160) (0.022)
Match dues collecting    \(-\) 0.628 \(-\) 0.410
   (0.166) (0.017)
Match is lobbying    0.127 0.103
   (0.189) (0.017)
Match is contracting    0.193 0.108
   (0.167) (0.014)
Log(Revenue)    0.522 0.253
   (0.037) (0.013)
Membership dues    0.000 0.000
   (0.000) (0.000)
Lobbying fees    0.000 0.000
   (0.000) (0.000)
Edges \(-\) 5.290 \(-\) 5.571 \(-\) 20.496 \(-\) 12.073
(0.158) (0.168) (1.122) (0.469)
Concurrent     \(-\) 0.527
    0.135
Isolates     0.960
    0.074
GWESP(\(\theta = 0.8\))     0.761
    0.072
Model type Dyadic-independent Dyadic-independent Dyadic-independent Network-dependent
Replicates 100 100 100 100
Median AIC 2450.750 2386.328 2128.629 2008.582
Median BIC 2467.852 2411.982 2205.590 2111.198