Skip to main content

Table 2 Rand Index, Purity and Average F1 scores against ground truth; the number of clusters for hMETIS, PaToH, Spectral, and Zhou-Spectral is set to the number of clusters returned by the IRMM method are 13, 79, 8, 18, and 1358 for Citeseer, Cora, Movielens, TwitterFootball, and Arnetminer, respectively

From: Hypergraph clustering by iteratively reweighted modularity maximization

 

Citeseer

Cora

MovieLens

TwitterFootball

Arnetminer

(a) Rand Index scores against ground truth.

hMETIS

0.6504

0.7592

0.4970

0.7639

0.0416

PaToH

0.6612

0.6919

0.4987

0.7553

0.0052

Spectral

0.7164

0.2478

0.4806

0.7486

0.0610

Zhou-Spectral

0.8210

0.5743

0.4977

0.9016

0.0628

Louvain

0.7361

0.7096

0.4898

0.6337

0.0384

NDP-Louvain

0.7899

0.8238

0.4988

0.9056

0.0821

IRMM

0.7986

0.8646

0.5091

0.9448

0.0967

(b) Purity scores against ground truth.

hMETIS

0.5894

0.6596

0.6893

0.2556

0.6831

PaToH

0.6271

0.5912

0.7017

0.3176

0.3928

Spectral

0.4629

0.3897

0.6832

0.8114

0.9216

Zhou-Spectral

0.5287

0.4145

0.7118

0.8325

0.9378

Louvain

0.7190

0.6836

0.7189

0.8054

0.9138

NDP-Louvain

0.7307

0.7597

0.7245

0.8829

0.9691

IRMM

0.7659

0.8138

0.7291

0.8948

0.9765

(c)Average F1 scores against ground truth.

hMETIS

0.1087

0.1075

0.1291

0.3197

0.0871

PaToH

0.0532

0.1171

0.1104

0.1132

0.0729

Spectral

0.1852

0.1291

0.1097

0.4496

0.0629

Zhou-Spectral

0.2774

0.2517

0.118

0.5055

0.0938

Louvain

0.1479

0.2725

0.1392

0.2238

0.1378

NDP-Louvain

0.2782

0.3248

0.1447

0.5461

0.1730

IRMM

0.4019

0.3709

0.1963

0.5924

0.1768

  1. Louvain, NDP-Louvain, and IRMM return the number of clusters on their own
  2. Best performance in each column is boldfaced