Table 3 Models performance in terms of accuracy: G-SIDL vs. L-SIDL vs. C-SIDL (IC-, CC-, and IFC-SIDL) vs. baseline models (LT-DT (Goyal et al. 2010) and IC-EM (Saito et al. 2008))
| Â | Foursquare | Plancast | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Â | NYC | LA | Â |
G-SIDL | 89.3% | 87.0% | 85.1% |
L-SIDL | 80.1% | 78.0% | 81.2% |
IC-SIDL | 84.3% | 81.1% | 81.8% |
CC-SIDL | 85.3% | 82.2% | 82.4% |
IFC-SIDL | 88.1% | 85.3% | 83.7% |
LT-DT (Goyal et al. 2010) | 62.3% | 62.0% | 77.8% |
IC-EM (Saito et al. 2008) | 63.2% | 62.9% | 76.9% |