Table 3 Descriptive results: changes of suppliers between 2006 and 2011, distribution of firms by revenue categories and by revenue dynamics
Count | |
|---|---|
Network dynamics | |
Whole network density in 2006 | 0.045 |
Whole network density in 2011a | 0.059 |
Average number of suppliers in 2006 | 4.50 |
Average number of suppliers in 2011a | 5.88 |
Preserved supply relationship | 388 |
New suppliers | 131 |
Abandoned suppliers | 38 |
Total of changes | 169 |
Jaccard index | 0.697 |
Missing links in 2006 | 0% |
Missing links in 2011 | 11.7% |
RPE performance categories | |
Low revenue firms in 2006 (logRPE < 10.5) | 21 |
Middle revenue firms in 2006 (10.5 < =logRPE < 11.5) | 62 |
High revenue firms in 2006 (logRPE > =11.5) | 16 |
NA in 2006 | 1 |
Low revenue firms in 2011 (logRPE < 10.5) | 25 |
Middle revenue firms in 2011 (10.5 < =logRPE < 11.5) | 55 |
High revenue firms in 2011 (logRPE > =11.5) | 12 |
NA in 2011 | 8 |
ROS performance categories | |
Loss-making firms in 2006 (ROS < 0) | 12 |
Middle return firms in 2006 (0 < =ROS < =0.03) | 59 |
High return firms in 2006 (ROS > 0.03) | 29 |
Loss-making firms in 2011 (ROS < 0) | 27 |
Middle return firms in 2011 (0 < =ROS < =0.03) | 48 |
High return firms in 2011 (ROS > 0.03) | 25 |